DEP Logo Florida Department of
Environmental Protection

Bob Martinez Center
2600 Blair Stone Road
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 		Storage Tanks &
Contamination
Monitoring Information
 
Journal Report
Report Run Date: 04/30/2021        Last Data Refresh: 04/29/2021        Report Generated from DOPPLER
 
Facility ID: 8732880
Facility Name: CITGO-BULLARD #217
 
02/16/2020 Editable Letter Activity Jarrett, Steven E
Activity Title: Compliance Assistance Offer Letter Activity Status: Closed
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 02/16/2020
Comment: Finished
Events:
Event Type: Document has been sent Date: 02/16/2020
Comment: Sent
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 02/16/2020 User: JARRETT_SE_1
Description: 2020-02-16 Citgo-Bullard #217 CAO Letter.
View Attachment
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 02/16/2020 User: JARRETT_SE_1
Description: 2020-02-16 Documentation via E-mail.
View Attachment
02/16/2020 Electronic Communication Activity Jarrett, Steven E
Activity Closed Date: 02/16/2020 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 02/16/2020
Recipient: Mike Bateman & Rick Herweh
Sender: Steve Jarrett
Subject: TCI Scheduling E-mails.
Message: (see attachment)
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 02/16/2020
Comment: Finished
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 02/16/2020 User: JARRETT_SE_1
Description: 2019-09-25 TCI Scheduling E-mails.
View Attachment
02/16/2020 Electronic Communication Activity Jarrett, Steven E
Activity Closed Date: 02/16/2020 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 02/16/2020
Recipient: Rick Herweh
Sender: Steve Jarrett
Subject: TCI inspection Report & CAO Letter via E-mail
Message: (see attachments)
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 02/16/2020
Comment: Finished
02/16/2020 Attachment Jarrett, Steven E
02/16/2020 Attachment Jarrett, Steven E
02/16/2020 Attachment Jarrett, Steven E
10/04/2019 Violation Open Jarrett, Steven E
Significance: Minor Status: Open
Criteria ID: 4068
Rule: 62-761.700(1), 62-761.700(1)(a), 62-761.700(1)(a)1., 62-761.700(1)(a)2.
10/04/2019 Site Inspection Activity Closed Jarrett, Steven E
Activity Result: Minor Out of Compliance Activity Status: Closed
On-Site Start Date: 10/04/2019
Activity Closed Date: 02/16/2020 Activity Closed By: JARRETT_SE_1
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 02/16/2020
Comment: Finished
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 02/16/2020 User: JARRETT_SE_1
Description: 2019-10-04 Updated Facility Site Map.
View Attachment
10/04/2019 Violation Open Jarrett, Steven E
Significance: Minor Status: Open
Criteria ID: 4077
Rule: 62-761.700(3)(b), 62-761.700(3)(b)1., 62-761.700(3)(b)2.
10/04/2019 Violation Open Jarrett, Steven E
Significance: Minor Status: Open
Criteria ID: 4051
Rule: 62-761.500(5)(c)
06/03/2018 Incident Activity Jarrett, Steven E
Activity Result: Has not led to Discharge Activity Status: Closed
Activity Closed Date: 06/03/2018
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 06/03/2018
Comment: Finished
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 06/03/2018 User: JARRETT_SE_1
Description: 2018-04-10 Documentation via E-mail.
View Attachment
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 06/03/2018 User: JARRETT_SE_1
Description: 2018-04-10 Hy-Tech Work Order & INF.
View Attachment
06/03/2018 Document Management Activity Jarrett, Steven E
Activity Title: Incident Notification Form Activity Status: Closed
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 06/03/2018
Comment: Finished
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 06/03/2018 User: JARRETT_SE_1
Description: 2018-04-10 Documentation via E-mail.
View Attachment
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 06/03/2018 User: JARRETT_SE_1
Description: 2018-04-10 Citgo-Bullard #217 INF.
View Attachment
06/03/2018 Electronic Communication Activity Jarrett, Steven E
Activity Closed Date: 06/03/2018 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 06/03/2018
Recipient: Steve Jarrett
Sender: Michelle Temple
Subject: Documentation Received via E-mail
Message: (see attachments)
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 06/03/2018
Comment: Finished
06/03/2018 Editable Letter Activity Jarrett, Steven E
Activity Title: Return to Compliance Letter Activity Status: Closed
Events:
Event Type: Document has been sent Date: 06/03/2018
Comment: Sent
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 06/03/2018
Comment: Finished
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 06/03/2018 User: JARRETT_SE_1
Description: 2018-06-03 RTC Letter via E-mail.
View Attachment
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 06/03/2018 User: JARRETT_SE_1
Description: 2018-06-03 Citgo-Bullard #217 RTC Letter.
View Attachment
01/05/2018 Enforcement Tracking Activity Pedigo, Leslie
Activity Status: Open
12/29/2017 Electronic Communication Activity Williamson, Keith E
Activity Closed Date: 12/29/2017 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 12/29/2017
Recipient: Rick Herweh
Sender: Keith Williamson
Subject: Enforcement Letter
Message: See attachment
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 12/29/2017
Comment: Finished
12/29/2017 Enforcement Referral Activity Williamson, Keith E
Activity Result: Accepted Activity Status: Closed
Activity Closed Date: 01/05/2018
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been submitted for approval Date: 12/29/2017
Comment: Submitted for approval by: Keith E Williamson: A routine compliance inspection was conducted on April 11, 2017 at the facility. Copies of the inspection reports are available in FIRST for your review. Based on the inspections, the facility is not operating in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 62-761, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). This facility is being referred to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection - Southwest District for possible enforcement action due to the regular tank STP and associated steel components in the STP sump are heavily corroded, there are open conduit pipes in the regular, premium and diesel STP sumps, the premium tank double-walled spill containment bucket interstice dip stick is missing, the diesel double-walled spill containment bucket interstice contains ~1/4" of fuel. Copies of the Polk County Property Appraiser documentation as well as the Florida Department of State Division of Corporations (SunBiz) documentation are also attached with this submittal.
Events:
Event Type: Activity/Document was acknowledged on this date Date: 01/04/2018
Comment: Acknowledged and Assigned by Laurel Culbreth
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been assigned Date: 01/04/2018
Comment: Assigned to Leslie Pedigo
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 01/05/2018
Comment: Finished
Events:
Event Type: Activity/Document was accepted on this date Date: 01/05/2018
Comment: Accepted by Leslie Pedigo: OK
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 12/29/2017 User: WILLIAMSON_KE_1
Description: Citgo-Bullard #217 Enforce. Let. 12-29-17.
View Attachment
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 12/29/2017 User: WILLIAMSON_KE_1
Description: Citgo-Bullard #217 Enforce. Let. (via e-mail 12-29-17).
View Attachment
12/28/2017 Electronic Communication Activity Cassels, Carol R
Activity Closed Date: 12/28/2017 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 12/28/2017
Recipient: Carol Cassels
Sender: Scott Nickels
Subject: Violation response email 05/16/2017
Message: See Comments & Attachments.
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 12/28/2017
Comment: Finished
11/28/2017 Phone Conversation Activity Jarrett, Steven E
Call Type: Incoming Activity Status: Closed
Phone Number: (813) 681-4279 Activity Closed Date: 11/28/2017
Subject: Per a conversation with Rick Herweh, when APEC purchased the Mid-State facilities last year, Mid-State never provided them the financial responsibility insurance information for 01/30/2015 to 01/30/2016. Per a review of Department files, we have copies of the Nautilus insurance policies for the former Mid-States sites for 01/30/2014 to 01/30/2015 and 01/30/2016 to 01/30/2017. Therefore, as the facility did have financial responsibility at the time of the inspection, the violation will be closed for not providing proof of financial responsibility for the 01/30/2015 to 01/30/2016 coverage period.
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 11/28/2017
Comment: Finished
06/21/2017 Electronic Communication Activity Cassels, Carol R
Activity Closed Date: 06/21/2017 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 06/21/2017
Recipient: Carol Cassels
Sender: Rick Herweh
Subject: Registration Update
Message: See Attachments.
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 06/21/2017
Comment: Finished
06/19/2017 Electronic Communication Activity Cassels, Carol R
Activity Closed Date: 06/19/2017 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 06/19/2017
Recipient: Rick Herweh
Sender: Carol Cassels
Subject: Initial Violation Notification Email
Message: See Comments & Attachments.
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 06/19/2017
Comment: Finished
06/19/2017 Electronic Communication Activity Cassels, Carol R
Activity Closed Date: 06/19/2017 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 06/19/2017
Recipient: Scott Nickels
Sender: Steve Jarrett
Subject: Inspection Scheduling
Message: See Attachments
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 06/19/2017
Comment: Finished
06/19/2017 Electronic Communication Activity Cassels, Carol R
Activity Closed Date: 06/19/2017 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 06/19/2017
Recipient: Carol Cassels
Sender: Scott Nickels
Subject: Violation Response
Message: See Comments & Attachments.
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 06/19/2017
Comment: Finished
06/19/2017 Electronic Communication Activity Cassels, Carol R
Activity Closed Date: 06/19/2017 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 06/19/2017
Recipient: Rick Herweh
Sender: Carol Cassels
Subject: Routine Compliance Inspection Report & NCL Email
Message: See Attachments.
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 06/19/2017
Comment: Finished
06/13/2017 Editable Letter Activity Cassels, Carol R
Activity Title: 1st Non-Compliance Letter Activity Status: Closed
Description: 2019-01-07 Followup Email
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 06/13/2017
Comment: Finished
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 06/13/2017 User: CASSELS_CR_2
Description: 1st Non-Compliance Letter
View Attachment
04/11/2017 Violation Closed Cassels, Carol R
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1115
Rule: 62-761.700(1)(c)1.
Comments: Facility equipment shall be maintained to a degree to allow you access. Water in spill containment units, especially above the fill cap shall be removed. Water in any sumps and dispenser liners above the piping opening/penetration (invert) shall be removed. All regulated substance shall be removed from any of the specified system components. Regulated substances: sheen, free product, mixed product water. Petroleum contact water shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department Hazardous Waste Section's Ch. 62-740 F.A.C., "Petroleum Contact Water".
04/11/2017 Site Inspection Activity Closed Cassels, Carol R
Activity Result: Major Out of Compliance Activity Status: Closed
On-Site Start Date: 04/11/2017
Activity Closed Date: 06/13/2017 Activity Closed By: CASSELS_CR_2
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 06/13/2017
Comment: Finished
04/11/2017 Violation Closed Cassels, Carol R
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1138
Rule: 62-761.820(1)(a), 62-761.820(1)(b), 62-761.820(1)(c)
Comments: Mark this as out of compliance if an incident was not investigated, or not investigated properly. See rule 62-761.450(2) for incident reporting requirements.
04/11/2017 Violation Closed Cassels, Carol R
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1105
Rule: 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d.
Comments: Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs?
04/11/2017 Violation Closed Cassels, Carol R
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1123
Rule: 62-761.710(2)(a), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(h)
Comments: If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. and g. Inventory - rules 62-761.640(3)(b)1-2, 62-761.640(3)(c) & 62-761.700(1)(c)5 b. Repair, operation, and maintenance - rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)5, 62-761.700(1)(a)6 & 62-761.700(1)(c)3 c. Release detection - rules 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.610(3)(b), 62-761.640(2)(c)4, 62-761.640(2)(e), 62-761.640(3)(d), 62-761.640(3)(e)1-5 & 62-761.640(3)(e)9 d. Release detection response level descriptions - rules 62-761.600(1)(b) & 62-761.640(1)(c) e. Tightness, pressure, and breach of integrity tests - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.640(1)(a) & 62-761.640(4)(a) f. Financial responsibility - rule 62-761.400(3) g. Repairs and replacements - rule 62-761.700(1)(a)6 The following are not this rule's issues: Rules 62-761.450(1)(a)1, 62-761.450(1)(a)2, 62-761.450(1)(a)3 & 62-761.450(1)(a)4 are verbal notices of activities that may also be written Rule 62-761.450(1)(b) is a registration issue Rules 62-761.450(2), 62-761.450(3)(a) & 62-761.450(3)(b) are INF/DRF reporting issues Rules 62-761.600(1)(a)3 & 62-761.600(1)(f) are covered by rule 62-761.710(3) Anything with cathodic protection is covered by rule 62-761.710(3)
04/11/2017 Violation Closed Cassels, Carol R
Significance: SNC-B Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1031
Rule: 62-761.500(5)(b)1., 62-761.500(5)(b)2., 62-761.500(5)(b)3., 62-761.500(5)(b)4., 62-761.500(5)(b)5.
Comments: For installation inspections, verify that the specified method(s) of overfill protection have been installed. Generally, tightness test data will report the presence or absence of these devices since the tester has to account for its presence in the tightness test procedure. In those instances when you did not observe the presence of the device, request a copy of the invoice listing the device, or a written statement from a contractor. Will the installed methods prevent an overfill? For high level alarms, where is the alarm box? Some facilities locate it inside a building where it may not be visible or audible to the deliverer. Has it been functionally tested in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions? What is their product transfer procedure? Tanks with both a ball check valve and a flow shut off device must have the former oriented above the latter. Ball check valves can not be used with coaxial vapor recovery delivery. Any metered delivery of product may negate both the ball check and flow shut off devices. Waste oil tanks that receive less than 25 gallons input at one time are not required to have overfill protection per federal requirements.
04/11/2017 Attachment Cassels, Carol R
04/11/2017 Violation Closed Cassels, Carol R
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1010
Rule: 62-761.450(2)(a)1., 62-761.450(2)(a)2., 62-761.450(2)(a)3., 62-761.450(2)(a)4., 62-761.450(2)(a)5., 62-761.450(2)(a)6., 62-761.450(2)(a)7.
Comments: Multiple incidents occurring at the same time at the facility may be reported on one form. #1-3 - Evidence of these types of INF situations are generally found during the inspector's paperwork review. Ask the facility representative what action they took in response, and in what time frame. If the situations are resolved within 24 hours, the owner/operator is not required to submit an INF to the local program. However, the actions they took to resolve the issue must be documented. #4-5, and 7 - Evidence of these types of situations are generally found during the outside or physical portion of the inspection. Give the facility owner/operator 24 hours to resolve, provided they document their actions. If they can not resolve the issues then they must submit the INF, at which time the two week investigative window opens. #6 - Evidence of this type of situation may be found during the physical examination of the release detection device (e.g. alarm mode), or during the examination of the records associated with the method. Note: Inspectors may find events that qualify as incidents during their review of the facility's paperwork. Such issues must have been resolved within 24 hours if an INF was not submitted at the time of the event.
09/11/2015 Electronic Communication Activity Merryman, Daniel T
Activity Closed Date: 09/11/2015 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 09/11/2015
Recipient: Jason Shepard
Sender: Daniel Merryman
Subject: Compliance Re-inspection
Message: (see attachment)
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 09/11/2015
Comment: Finished
09/04/2015 Site Inspection Activity Closed Merryman, Daniel T
Activity Result: In Compliance Activity Status: Closed
On-Site Start Date: 09/04/2015
Activity Closed Date: 09/11/2015 Activity Closed By: MERRYMAN_DT_1
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 09/11/2015
Comment: Finished
09/02/2015 Electronic Communication Activity Merryman, Daniel T
Activity Closed Date: 09/02/2015 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 09/02/2015
Recipient: Daniel Merryman
Sender: Jason Shepard
Subject: Received MLLD and BOI test results to close testing related violations
Message: (see attached)
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 09/02/2015
Comment: Finished
08/14/2015 Electronic Communication Activity Merryman, Daniel T
Activity Closed Date: 08/14/2015 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 08/14/2015
Recipient: Jason Shepard
Sender: Daniel Merryman
Subject: E-mail sent regarding resolution of long standing open violations.
Message: (see attachment)
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 08/14/2015
Comment: Finished
08/14/2015 Phone Conversation Activity Merryman, Daniel T
Call Type: Outgoing Activity Status: Closed
Phone Number: (863) 676-3910 Activity Closed Date: 08/14/2015
Subject: Left voicemail message with Jason Shepard to discuss resolution of all open violations with this facility, with emphasis on resolving the major violation ASAP. I asked him to return my call ASAP to discuss.
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 08/14/2015
Comment: Finished
04/01/2015 Electronic Communication Activity Merryman, Daniel T
Activity Closed Date: 05/18/2015 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 04/01/2015
Recipient: Jay Dery
Sender: Daniel Merryman
Subject: Routine Compliance Inspection and Non-Compliance Letter
Message: (see attachment)
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 05/18/2015
Comment: Finished
03/31/2015 Editable Letter Activity Jarrett, Steven E
Activity Title: 1st Non-Compliance Letter Activity Status: Closed
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 04/01/2015
Comment: Finished
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 04/01/2015 User: MERRYMAN_DT_1
Description: 2015-04-01 NCL
View Attachment
02/24/2015 Violation Closed Jarrett, Steven E
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1082
Rule: 62-761.600(1)(b), 62-761.640(1)(c)
Comments: Mark this as out of compliance if the RDRL hasn't been written, or if the RDRL presented doesn't match the release detection methods used. Is reality different from their plan? Note that an SPCC or groundwater monitoring plan will suffice as an RDRL. See following sample form. RELEASE DETECTION RESPONSE LEVELS FACILITY NAME: ________________________________________ FACILITY #: ______________ In accordance with 62-761.600(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) the following Release Detection Response Level (RDRL) has been established for the checked method(s) of Release Detection: RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Statistical Inventory Reconciliation (SIR) with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: One failed SIR report or two consecutive inconclusive SIR reports. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Continuous Automatic Tank Gauge System RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Automatic Tank Gauge System with a tank tightness test every three years RDRL: A failed 0.2 gph leak test report/printout. A failed tank tightness test. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vacuum Monitoring RDRL: A sudden loss of vacuum or a 20% loss of the original vacuum. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of tank interstice RDRL: Presence of free product or water. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Tank and Line Tightness Tests used with daily inventory reconciliation (available until 10 yrs. after last tank upgrade) RDRL: Failed tank and/or line tightness test, unexplained water fluctuations exceeding one inch; significant loss or gain. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Groundwater Monitoring Wells RDRL: Presence of free product or sheen. Discharge Report Form must be submitted within 24 hours. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Vapor Monitoring Wells RDRL: Vapor concentrations >= 500 ppm for gasoline, Vapor concentrations >= 50 ppm for diesel RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Manual Tank Gauging (Only valid for tanks up to 2000 gals) RDRL: Readings exceeding the standards described in 62-761.640 Table MTG, F.A.C.. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Electronic Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Alarm conditions, audible or visible. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Visual Monitoring of sumps and/or dispenser liners RDRL: Water above the entrance of double-wall piping or presence of free product. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Line Leak Detector RDRL: Tripping/Activation of leak detector. RELEASE DETECTION METHOD: Annual Line Tightness Test RDRL: Failed tightness test As required by 62-761.200(71), F.A.C., if the RDRL is measured or observed, we will initiate activities to determine if an incident, release, or discharge has occurred. If within 24 hours we can not determine if a discharge occurred, an Incident Notification Form will be submitted
02/24/2015 Site Inspection Activity Closed Merryman, Daniel T
Activity Result: Major Out of Compliance Activity Status: Closed
On-Site Start Date: 02/24/2015
Activity Closed Date: 03/31/2015 Activity Closed By: JARRETT_SE_1
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 03/31/2015
Comment: Finished
02/24/2015 Violation Closed Jarrett, Steven E
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1058
Rule: 62-761.600(1)(a)1.
Comments: Mark this as out of compliance if the release detection method is not able to register or detect a new release. If you feel that the release detection system has lost its ability to detect a new release, document why in the inspection report. Examples include: a. An automatic tank gauge system already in alarm mode will not be able to detect a new release; b. sumps with water/product may impair detection abilities; c. monitoring wells at contaminated sites may also have impaired ability to detect new releases. See .640(2)(c)2. for further guidance on using contaminated monitoring wells for release detection.
02/24/2015 Violation Closed Jarrett, Steven E
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1020
Rule: 62-761.500(1)(d)5.
Comments: The breach of integrity test is intended for closed interstices only. A closed interstice has no unsecured or unsealed opening to the outside. Double-walled piping without a boot connector, or if the boot has a bleed valve (for tightness testing), is considered an open interstice. The breach of integrity test may be performed by using at least one of the following methods: a. A continuous hydrostatic system b. A continuous vacuum system c. Testing of the interstice for liquid tightness in accordance with manufacturer's installation instructions; or d. Another method in accordance with subsection 62-761.850(2). How the breach of integrity test is performed or to what degree can depend on the depth to groundwater at each facility. When the tank and or piping are fully submerged, the lack of water intrusion into the secondary containment may be considered a verification of its integrity. However, when total submersion is not the case, one of the rule stipulated options must be used. The breach of integrity test should not be confused with a precision tightness test, which tests the primary tank or piping only. The breach of integrity test will test the secondary and primary shells, but is not a precision test.
02/24/2015 Violation Closed Jarrett, Steven E
Significance: SNC-B Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1062
Rule: 62-761.600(1)(d)
Comments: Mark this as out of compliance if any release detection method has not been monitored as required. Look for evidence that the release detection system is not being properly monitored. Examples include: blocked access to monitoring wells; ATG in alarm; ATG panel hidden from view; ATG tape spool empty; buried or submerged sampling ports; corroded locks; or no dispenser keys. Be aware that manual tank gauging requires weekly sampling. Electronic line leak detectors may be wired into an ATG with a memory of test cycles. Facilities with static/periodic ATG systems are required to provide one passing test per product per month. This method has a minimum fuel capacity requirement. Facilities with continuous electronic leak detection ATG systems (e.g., Veeder-Root CSLD) are required to provide one passing test per product per month, although the system must be in daily operation with monthly summary logs. This method has no minimum fuel requirement. If there is a record keeping problem, see rule 62-761.710(2).
02/24/2015 Violation Closed Jarrett, Steven E
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1138
Rule: 62-761.820(1)(a), 62-761.820(1)(b), 62-761.820(1)(c)
Comments: Mark this as out of compliance if an incident was not investigated, or not investigated properly. See rule 62-761.450(2) for incident reporting requirements.
02/24/2015 Violation Closed Jarrett, Steven E
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1115
Rule: 62-761.700(1)(c)1.
Comments: Facility equipment shall be maintained to a degree to allow you access. Water in spill containment units, especially above the fill cap shall be removed. Water in any sumps and dispenser liners above the piping opening/penetration (invert) shall be removed. All regulated substance shall be removed from any of the specified system components. Regulated substances: sheen, free product, mixed product water. Petroleum contact water shall be disposed of in accordance with the Department Hazardous Waste Section's Ch. 62-740 F.A.C., "Petroleum Contact Water".
02/24/2015 Violation Closed Jarrett, Steven E
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1010
Rule: 62-761.450(2)(a)1., 62-761.450(2)(a)2., 62-761.450(2)(a)3., 62-761.450(2)(a)4., 62-761.450(2)(a)5., 62-761.450(2)(a)6., 62-761.450(2)(a)7.
Comments: Multiple incidents occurring at the same time at the facility may be reported on one form. #1-3 - Evidence of these types of INF situations are generally found during the inspector's paperwork review. Ask the facility representative what action they took in response, and in what time frame. If the situations are resolved within 24 hours, the owner/operator is not required to submit an INF to the local program. However, the actions they took to resolve the issue must be documented. #4-5, and 7 - Evidence of these types of situations are generally found during the outside or physical portion of the inspection. Give the facility owner/operator 24 hours to resolve, provided they document their actions. If they can not resolve the issues then they must submit the INF, at which time the two week investigative window opens. #6 - Evidence of this type of situation may be found during the physical examination of the release detection device (e.g. alarm mode), or during the examination of the records associated with the method. Note: Inspectors may find events that qualify as incidents during their review of the facility's paperwork. Such issues must have been resolved within 24 hours if an INF was not submitted at the time of the event.
02/24/2015 Violation Closed Jarrett, Steven E
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1105
Rule: 62-761.700(1)(a)1.a., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.b., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.c., 62-761.700(1)(a)1.d.
Comments: Mark this as out of compliance if you observe a needed repair that hasn't been completed, and the potential for a release exists. Examples of components that would need repair include (but are not limited to) leaking dispensers, cracked spill containment, improperly anchored shear valves, or any compromised containment component. Upon the detection of one of the above conditions, has the facility initiated and completed repairs?
02/24/2015 Violation Closed Jarrett, Steven E
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1103
Rule: 62-761.640(4)(a)1., 62-761.640(4)(a)2., 62-761.640(4)(a)3., 62-761.640(4)(a)4.
Comments: Installation - verify that the line leak detector has been installed during the final installation inspection. Compliance - check to see that the unit is present. Examine the annual function test data - a pass alone is not sufficient. The tester must demonstrate 3.0 gph discharge detection for the mechanical (flow restrictor). Note that the electronic (auto shut off) line leak detector does not need an annual test, but must still be able to detect a 0.2 gph leak after it has been tripped at 150% line operating pressure. Replacements - unit must be tested out of the box - function must be proven. 3.0 gph = 185.4 ml/min (To convert milliliters/minute to gallons/hour, multiple the milliliters by 0.0162162; or, 1 gph equals 61.8 ml/min). Values greater than 186 ml/min fail. Values less than 185 ml/min mean that the line leak detector will activate at a more restrictive rate.
02/24/2015 Violation Closed Jarrett, Steven E
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1123
Rule: 62-761.710(2)(a), 62-761.710(2)(b), 62-761.710(2)(c), 62-761.710(2)(d), 62-761.710(2)(e), 62-761.710(2)(f), 62-761.710(2)(g), 62-761.710(2)(h)
Comments: If the problem involves failure to perform according to the standards in each of the following areas, then note these items in addition to the paperwork for this rule: a. and g. Inventory - rules 62-761.640(3)(b)1-2, 62-761.640(3)(c) & 62-761.700(1)(c)5 b. Repair, operation, and maintenance - rules 62-761.700(1)(a)1, 62-761.700(1)(a)5, 62-761.700(1)(a)6 & 62-761.700(1)(c)3 c. Release detection - rules 62-761.600(1)(e), 62-761.610(3)(b), 62-761.640(2)(c)4, 62-761.640(2)(e), 62-761.640(3)(d), 62-761.640(3)(e)1-5 & 62-761.640(3)(e)9 d. Release detection response level descriptions - rules 62-761.600(1)(b) & 62-761.640(1)(c) e. Tightness, pressure, and breach of integrity tests - rules 62-761.610(3)(a)1, 62-761.640(1)(a) & 62-761.640(4)(a) f. Financial responsibility - rule 62-761.400(3) g. Repairs and replacements - rule 62-761.700(1)(a)6 The following are not this rule's issues: Rules 62-761.450(1)(a)1, 62-761.450(1)(a)2, 62-761.450(1)(a)3 & 62-761.450(1)(a)4 are verbal notices of activities that may also be written Rule 62-761.450(1)(b) is a registration issue Rules 62-761.450(2), 62-761.450(3)(a) & 62-761.450(3)(b) are INF/DRF reporting issues Rules 62-761.600(1)(a)3 & 62-761.600(1)(f) are covered by rule 62-761.710(3) Anything with cathodic protection is covered by rule 62-761.710(3)
03/01/2013 Electronic Communication Activity Winn, Justin P.
Activity Closed Date: 03/01/2013 Activity Status: Closed
Date: 03/01/2013
Recipient: Justin Winn
Sender: Jason Shepard
Subject: BOI Attachment
Message: BOI Attachment
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 03/01/2013
Comment: Finished
11/28/2012 Attachment Winn, Justin P.
11/28/2012 Editable Letter Activity Winn, Justin P.
Activity Title: 1st Non-Compliance Letter Activity Status: Closed
Events:
Event Type: Document has been sent Date: 11/28/2012
Comment: Sent on Wed Nov 28 00:00:00 EST 2012
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 11/28/2012
Comment: Finished
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 11/28/2012 User: WINN_JP_1
Description: 1st Non-compliance Letter
View Attachment
11/28/2012 Site Inspection Activity Closed Winn, Justin P.
Activity Result: Minor Out of Compliance Activity Status: Closed
On-Site Start Date: 11/16/2012
Activity Closed Date: 11/28/2012 Activity Closed By: WINN_JP_1
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 11/28/2012
Comment: Finished
11/28/2012 Violation Closed Winn, Justin P.
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1020
Rule: 62-761.500(1)(d)5.
Comments: The breach of integrity test is intended for closed interstices only. A closed interstice has no unsecured or unsealed opening to the outside. Double-walled piping without a boot connector, or if the boot has a bleed valve (for tightness testing), is considered an open interstice. The breach of integrity test may be performed by using at least one of the following methods: a. A continuous hydrostatic system b. A continuous vacuum system c. Testing of the interstice for liquid tightness in accordance with manufacturer's installation instructions; or d. Another method in accordance with subsection 62-761.850(2). How the breach of integrity test is performed or to what degree can depend on the depth to groundwater at each facility. When the tank and or piping are fully submerged, the lack of water intrusion into the secondary containment may be considered a verification of its integrity. However, when total submersion is not the case, one of the rule stipulated options must be used. The breach of integrity test should not be confused with a precision tightness test, which tests the primary tank or piping only. The breach of integrity test will test the secondary and primary shells, but is not a precision test.
07/20/2011 Site Inspection Activity Closed Slappey, Wayne Russell
Activity Result: In Compliance Activity Status: Closed
On-Site Start Date: 07/20/2011
Activity Closed Date: 07/25/2011 Activity Closed By: SLAPPEY_WR_1
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 07/25/2011
Comment: Finished
09/28/2010 Site Inspection Activity Closed Winn, Justin P.
Activity Result: In Compliance Activity Status: Closed
On-Site Start Date: 09/17/2010
Activity Closed Date: 09/28/2010 Activity Closed By: WINN_JP_1
Events:
Event Type: Activity has been finished Date: 09/28/2010
Comment: Finished
08/26/2009 Phone Conversation Activity Slappey, Wayne Russell
Activity Status: Closed
Phone Number: (863) 676-3910 Activity Closed Date: 08/26/2009
Subject: Scheduled annual inspection for 7/23/09. Asked to see records per 62-761.710 FAC.
07/29/2009 Site Inspection Activity Closed Slappey, Wayne Russell
Activity Result: In Compliance Activity Status: Closed
On-Site Start Date: 07/29/2009
Activity Closed Date: 07/29/2009 Activity Closed By: SLAPPEY_WR_1
11/26/2008 Attachment Winn, Justin P.
11/21/2008 Site Inspection Activity Closed Winn, Justin P.
Activity Result: In Compliance Activity Status: Closed
On-Site Start Date: 11/21/2008
Activity Closed Date: 11/26/2008 Activity Closed By: WINN_JP_1
Comments:
Comment Date: 12/16/2008 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: Facilitys Annual Compliance Site Inspection performed on 12/10/2008 by inspector Jay Dery. The facility consists of (1) 12,000 gallon double walled regular unleaded gasoline UST and (1) 12,000 gallon compartmented (6/6 split) double walled premium unleaded gasoline and vehicular diesel UST. Facilitys Method of release detection is Electronic Monitoring of the tanks interstices in conjunction with annual operability testing of Veeder Root TLS-350 (EQ-197) Electronic Monitoring system, annual testing of mechanical line leak detectors, monthly electronic monitor checks (Liquid Status Recordings) and monthly visual inspections of piping, dispensers, dispenser liners, STP sumps, spill buckets and hoses.. The Facilitys storage tank registration placard, RDRL, CFR, Proof of Financial Responsibility, monthly visual inspections and records of Monthly Liquid Status results were provided, reviewed and appeared accurate. At the time of this inspection the Liquid Status and Alarm History reports were printed; all sensors were in a status of normal and the Alarm History Report displayed no unexplained interstitial alarms. Monthly visual inspections accurately noted site conditions and had been performed within the required 35 day time frames with the exception of the March 2008 inspection. Electronic Monitor Operability testing performed by Donald Reeves of AAA Tank Testers Cert# B33017, Line Leak Detector testing performed by Jeff Craig of AAA Tank Testers RQ-0060839 all results were passing; next testing due as noted in testing to be performed section of this report. During the Physical Inspection all dispensers and dispenser liners were found to be in good condition; liners were clean and dry, shear valves in place and anchored. Hoses and piping were in adequate condition, no obvious signs of leaking however some staining was observed on dispenser 1 and 3 product piping; no accumulation of product was noted. STP sumps were also clean and mostly dry; a small amount of water was found in the diesel STP sump but was below product piping and did not inhibit visual inspection. Spill buckets were in good condition and clean, lid color coding is fading; recommend painting spill bucket fill lids. Cover letter as mailed to facility attached.
03/03/2008 TCAR Activity Dery, Wayne C.
Activity Result: Satisfied Activity Status: Closed
Activity Closed Date: 03/03/2008
03/03/2008 Editable Letter Activity Dery, Wayne C.
Activity Title: Closure Review Letter Activity Status: Closed
Events:
Event Type: Document has been sent Date: 03/03/2008
Comment: Sent on Mon Mar 03 10:54:34 EST 2008
01/03/2008 Issue Document Activity Dery, Wayne C.
Activity Status: Closed
Contact Name: Jason Shepard Activity Closed Date: 01/03/2008
12/06/2007 Phone Conversation Activity Dery, Wayne C.
Activity Status: Closed
Activity Closed Date: 12/06/2007
Subject: Spoke with Jason Shepard and the tank registration office; credit has been applied to account resolving violation 1002.
Comments:
Comment Date: 07/30/2009 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: Facility annual compliance inspection performed by Jay Dery on 7/28/2009; inspector accompanied by facility representative Clark Vandevander. Facility consists of (1) 10,000 gallon SW Vehicular Diesel AST, (1) dispenser and above ground single wall steel piping all inside a sealed concrete secondary containment. Facility's primary release detection method is monthly visual monitoring of all regulated aboveground storage tank system components, including the tank, piping, dispenser and containment. The facility's tank registration placard, CFR, RDRL, proof of financial responsibility and monthly visual inspections were provided, reviewed and found to be correct. Monthly visual inspections had been performed monthly, within the required 35 day time frame and accurately noted site conditions. At the time of this inspection the tank was in good condition. Secondary containment sealant exhibited some minor peeling how ever sealant is visible beneath; monitor and reseal as necessary. The containment drain valve was closed. The piping is painted and in good condition. No anti-siphon or solenoid valves are required on dispensing as all piping is inside containment. Dispenser and hose were in adequate condition; emergency breakaway noted. Note small amount of water was present due to recent rain storm; continue to remove storm water within the required 7day time frame. Cover letter as mailed to facility attached.
10/25/2007 Issue Document Activity Dery, Wayne C.
Activity Status: Closed
Contact Name: Jason Shephard Activity Closed Date: 10/25/2007
Comments:
Comment Date: 05/22/2009 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: The following facility is being referred for possible enforcement action, due to SNC violations relating to an extended period without release detection, failure to perform required tank tightness testing and lack of Financial Responsibility as per Southwest District direction: Facility had no Release Detection Results for Feb, Mar, April, June, July, Aug., Sept. and Nov. of 2008 and No Financial Responsibility from Dec, 2 2008 to present (a period of 17 months). Tank testing was due on 8/26/2008 but was never performed.
09/05/2007 Violation Closed Dery, Wayne C.
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1002
Rule: 62-761.400(2)(a)
Comments: Does STCM accurately reflect the tanks at the facility? This question concerns the registration process and payment of fees only - it is not about accurate registration. Check the number of tanks listed on the registration placard. Can the facility owner/operator produce a registration form to document submittal to DEP? Does STCM show that all DEP fees are paid? At the time of tank closure, a registration form should be submitted showing the change in tank codes.
Comments:
Comment Date: 12/10/2008 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: UL 142 listed single wall aboveground steel storage tank, above ground single wall steel piping, suction fed dispenser. Tank is located within sealed concrete secondary containment. Release Detection is monthly visual inspection on all visible storage tank components including tank, containment, piping, dispenser, dispenser liner and hoses.
09/05/2007 Editable Letter Activity Dery, Wayne C.
Activity Title: District Non-Compliance Letter Activity Status: Closed
Events:
Event Type: Document has been sent Date: 09/05/2007
Comment: Sent on Wed Sep 05 13:52:40 EST 2007
Comments:
Comment Date: 12/18/2008 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: Facility Annual Compliance Site Inspection performed by Jay Dery on 12/10/2008. Facilitys Method of Release detection is SIR (Simmons Version 5.7.L.M (EQ-502) in conjunction with Monthly Visual Inspections of all visible storage tank system components, Triennial Tank testing and Annual Line and Leak detector testing. The facility consists of (3) 8000 gallon single wall steel underground storage tanks, single wall fiberglass piping, single wall spill containment buckets and (3) STP streetboxes. The facility's Tank Registration Placard, CFR, RDRL, Proof of Financial Responsibility and Monthly Visual Inspections were provided at the time of this inspection. Sir records indicated all results as passing. Both the Sir records and Monthly visual inspections had been performed monthly and within the required 35 day time frames. The Annual Line and Line Leak Detector and Triennial Tank Tightness testing, performed by Jeff Craig of AAA Tank Testers (RQ-0060838), results were all available and passing; next due dates as noted in testing to be preformed section of this report. During the physical inspection the spill containment buckets were clean, dry and properly color coded, although lightly faded; paint as necessary. Dispensers, dispenser liners and hoses appeared in adequate condition and dispensing system product line shear valves were in place and anchored. STP streetboxes were accessible and STPs, leak detectors and piping were visible and appeared to be in good condition. Cover letter as mailed to facility attached.
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 09/05/2007 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: NCL Report
View Attachment
08/29/2007 Site Inspection Activity Closed Dery, Wayne C.
Activity Result: Minor Out of Compliance Activity Status: Closed
On-Site Start Date: 08/29/2007
Activity Closed Date: 09/05/2007 Activity Closed By: DERY_WC_1
Comments:
Comment Date: 11/13/2008 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: Facility installed a 2000 gallon emergency generator with belly tank on August 1, 2006; the tank was placed into service in April of 2007 and registered on September 4, 2008. Insurance was obtained as a means of demonstrating financial responsibility on September 22, 2008. A period of seventeen months without financial responsibility had passed between the in service date and the date on which financial responsibility was demonstrated.
08/28/2007 Phone Conversation Activity Dery, Wayne C.
Activity Status: Closed
Phone Number: 863-676-3910 Activity Closed Date: 08/28/2007
Subject: Called Jason Shepherd regarding annual inspection on 8/29/2007-left message.
Comments:
Comment Date: 11/12/2008 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: Facility Annual Compliance Inspection performed on 10/6/2008 by Jay Dery. Facilitys Primary Release Detection is Monthly Visual Inspections of AST including the electronic control panel for any DW tank interstice alarms, the overfill spill containment, all aboveground piping. At the time of inspection the Facility Storage Registration Placard was current and posted, Financial Responsibility was demonstrated, Self Insurance Letter from the CFO, effective 3/14/08, Certification of Financial Responsibility form, Release Detection Response Level statement and Monthly Visual Inspections were also available and appeared accurate, continue to perform Monthly Visual Inspections within the 35 day timeframe. Annual Operability Test of the electronic system performed on 9/17/2008 by Power Pro-tech Services, Inc. Facility consists of (1) 1000 gallon JRS generator sub-base DW steel tank which was good condition; no leaks, corrosion, or staining anywhere on the tank, piping, or surrounding area; overfill spill containment bucket in good condition; Krueger Sentry level gauge with high level alarm next to fill port for overfill protection; tank labeled, vented, grounded; on concrete pad with barriers. NexGear display panel was not operating properly however facility inspector is using visual verification of interstice as noted on monthly visual inspections; if issue is not resolved an upadated temporary RDRL should be completed. Piping is minimal length, small diameter, synthetic, suction tubing supply and return lines leading up from the tank to the generator; no valves required. Cover Letter as mailed to facility attached.
08/28/2007 Phone Conversation Activity Dery, Wayne C.
Activity Status: Closed
Phone Number: 863-676-3910 Activity Closed Date: 08/28/2007
Subject: Lleft another message for Jason regarding annual compliance inspection.
Comments:
Comment Date: 11/12/2008 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: Facility Annual Compliance Site Inspection performed 11/3/2008 by Jay Dery; inspector accompanied by facility representative Brenda Williams. Primary Method of Release detection is continuous electronic monitoring of two double wall underground tanks interstitial spaces in conjunction with monthly visual inspection of piping, sumps, dispensers, dispenser liners and spill buckets. At the time of inspection the Facility Storage Tank Registration Placard was posted in plain view, RDRL, CFR, monthly visual inspections and monthly electronic print outs were available. CFR was correct and proof of insurance was provided. Monthly visual inspections accurately reflected site conditions and had been performed monthly and within the required 35 day time frame. Monthly electronic monitoring report dates matched those of the monthly visual inspections and all alarms were explained and verified. Annual ELLD and operability tests were performed by Down Under Tank Testing, Inc. on 6/5/08. During physical inspection all sensors were found to be in a "normal" status, dispensers were in good condition; shear valves were present and properly anchored. Dispenser liners and STP sumps were clean and dry; liquid sensors for secondary method of release detection were properly placed and mounted. Spill buckets were also clean, dry, in good condition and properly color coded. Cover letter as mailed to facility attached.
04/30/2007 Editable Letter Activity Dery, Wayne C.
Activity Title: District Non-Compliance Letter Activity Status: Closed
Events:
Event Type: Document has been sent Date: 04/30/2007
Comment: Sent on Mon Apr 30 00:00:00 EST 2007
Comments:
Comment Date: 03/26/2008 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: Facility Compliance Re-Inspection performed on 3/20/2008. Facilitys Primary method of Release Detection is Electronic Monitoring of the two double wall tank interstices in conjunction with monthly visual inspections of the tanks, piping, fill port spill containments, Dispensers and Dispenser liners. The facility Tank Registration Placard, proof of Financial Responsibility, CFR, RDRL, Monthly Visual Inspections and Monthly Electronic Monitoring Reports were provided and appeared correct. The Tanks and above ground piping were found to be in adequate condition and the required valves were in place. Dispenser liners were clean and dry and dispenser shear valves were properly anchored, Spill containment buckets were also in good condition, clean and dry. Omntec OEL8000 II electronic monitoring system appeared functional. Cover letter mailed to facility as attached.
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 04/30/2007 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: NCL Report
View Attachment
04/19/2007 Record Document Activity Dery, Wayne C.
Activity Status: Closed
Contact Name: Jason Shepherd Activity Closed Date: 04/19/2007
Comments:
Comment Date: 02/25/2008 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: Compliance Re-inspection performed 2/13/2008. At the time of the inspection the spill containment bucket were dry. STP and line transition sumps were clean and dry. Electronic Monitoring report shows all alarms in a status of normal. Alarm report attached. Cover letter as mailed to facility attached.
04/19/2007 Record Document Activity Dery, Wayne C.
Activity Status: Closed
Contact Name: Jason Shepherd Activity Closed Date: 04/19/2007
Comments:
Comment Date: 02/28/2008 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: THIS INSPECTION WAS NOT USED- SYSTEM ERROR-DUPLICATE REPORT
04/11/2007 Attachment Cassels, Carol R.
03/28/2007 Attachment Newberg, Dennis R.
03/16/2007 Attachment Cassels, Carol R.
03/16/2007 Site Inspection Activity Closed Cassels, Carol R.
Activity Result: Minor Out of Compliance Activity Status: Closed
On-Site Start Date: 03/16/2007
Activity Closed Date: 04/30/2007 Activity Closed By: DERY_WC_1
Comments:
Comment Date: 02/05/2008 User: CASSELS_CR_1
Description: Tank is a DW Convault; steel primary with 30 mil thick high-density polyethylene membrane secondary and a concrete vault encasement; EQ-201 Piping is ~3/4" all aboveground painted steel suction supply and return with anti-siphon and isolation valves.
03/16/2007 Violation Closed Cassels, Carol R.
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1007
Rule: 62-761.450(1)(a)3.a., 62-761.450(1)(a)3.b.
Comments: A good working relationship with the PSSC contractors should minimize scheduling problems. Notice can be accepted in these formats: Verbal Written Fax Email
Comments:
Comment Date: 02/05/2008 User: CASSELS_CR_1
Description: Tank is a DW Convault; steel primary with 30 mil thick high-density polyethylene membrane secondary and a concrete vault encasement; EQ-201 Piping is ~3/4" all aboveground painted steel suction supply and return with anti-siphon and isolation valves.
03/16/2007 Attachment Cassels, Carol R.
03/15/2007 Editable Letter Activity Dery, Wayne C.
Activity Title: District Non-Compliance Letter Activity Status: Closed
Events:
Event Type: Document has been sent Date: 03/15/2007
Comment: Sent on Thu Mar 15 00:00:00 EST 2007
Comments:
Comment Date: 09/27/2007 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: Storage Tank Facility Annual Site Inspection Performed on 5/15/2007. Facilitys Primary Release Detection Method is Monthly Visual Inspection of all regulated aboveground storage tank system components, including the tanks, piping, dispensers, spill buckets and containments. The facility Tank Registration Placard, CFR, RDRL, Proof of Financial Responsibility and Monthly visual inspections were available, reviewed and found to be correct. Monthly visual inspections had been performed monthly and within the required 35 day time frame. The facility consists of (2) 10,000 vehicular fuel tanks, (1) 2,000 gallon waste oil tank, (1) 1,000 generator belly tank and (1) 5,000 generator supply tank; all tanks are single walled aboveground steel in sealed concrete block secondary containments. The containments were clean and for the most part dry, drain valves were closed and containments were adequately sealed. All piping (except for the belly tank) is single wall above ground steel painted for corrosion protection; both the tanks and the piping were in adequate condition; the diesel tank has some paint chipping and should be repainted or touched up before corrosion becomes an issue. The generator belly tank is equipped with a Krueger Pop-up gauge for overfill protection. The vehicular tanks dispensing equipment appeared to be properly maintained and there were no signs of leaking or release. Cover Letter as Mailed to Facility Attached.
Attachments:
Attachment Date: 03/15/2007 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: NCL Report
View Attachment
03/14/2007 Violation Closed Dery, Wayne C.
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1003
Rule: 62-761.400(2)(f)
Comments: All federal facilities with USTs will have a placard. Per FS 376.3077, "It is unlawful for any owner, operator, or supplier to pump or otherwise deposit any motor fuel into a tank required to be registered under section 376.303 FS, unless proof of valid registration is displayed on such tank itself or the dispensing or measuring device connected thereto or, where appropriate, in the office or kiosk of the facility where the tank is located." Penalties can be assessed to the facility owner for failure to properly register tank systems. Note that penalties can be assessed to the supplier that delivers motor fuel to an unregistered facility. Check the details on the placard. Do they agree with the location you are inspecting? Owners of multiple facilities may switch placards by mistake. Placards are not always issued or received in a timely manner at the change of year period (June and July). Provide the DEP Tallahassee phone number to the facility so they may resolve problems (850) 245-8850; (850) 245-8840. Check STCM in the registration/placard section for the date that the payment was made and the date that the placard was issued. The location of the placard in plain view can be subjective in interpretation: a. For vehicular fuel facilities, plain view is meant to allow the transport delivery driver to view the placard prior to delivering fuel. b. A legal definition is an exception to the general requirement of a valid search warrant to legitimize a search or seizure; a search implies prying into hidden places, and it is not a search to observe what is open to view.
Comments:
Comment Date: 09/24/2007 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: Facilitys Annual Site Inspection Performed on 9/19/2007. Facilitys Method of release detection is Monthly Manual Monitoring of Tank Interstices and in conjunction with annual testing of line leak detectors and electronic monitoring system (for electronic line leak detectors) and monthly visual inspections of Double Wall Piping Interstices, STP sumps, dispensers, dispenser liners and spill containment buckets. The Facilitys tank registration placard, CFR, RDRL and Proof of Financial Responsibility were provided and found to be correct. Monthly visual inspections were presented and had been performed monthly and within the 35 day requirement. Monthly visual inspection also listed monthly tank interstitial checks; results were listed as dry. A copy of the most recent Annual operability test performed 2/14/2007 (next due by 2/14/2008) by PEC (RQ-66486) was reviewed and results were found to be passing. A copy of the Line Leak Detector report for 2/14/2007 was also provided however the report does not show an alarm for low pressure and shutdown; provided documentation of Leak Detector operability. During the Physical Inspection all Dispenser liners and STP sump containments were dry and found to be in good condition. Dispenser Shear Valve anchors were present and properly anchored. Double wall piping integrity appeared sufficient; piping test boots were loose and interstices were open to allow any release of product to be contained and detected. Spill buckets were in good condition, clean, dry and properly color coded; markings on the spill bucket lids is however fading, continue to paint lids as needed. Cover letter as mailed to facility attached.
03/14/2007 Site Inspection Activity Closed Dery, Wayne C.
Activity Result: Major Out of Compliance Activity Status: Closed
On-Site Start Date: 03/14/2007
Activity Closed Date: 03/14/2007 Activity Closed By: DERY_WC_1
Comments:
Comment Date: 09/24/2007 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: Facilitys Annual Site Inspection Performed on 9/18/2007. Facilitys Method of release detection is Continuous Electronic Monitoring of Tank Interstices and STP Sumps in conjunction with annual testing of line leak detectors, annual operability testing of Electronic Monitoring system and monthly visual inspections of Double Wall Piping Interstices, dispensers, dispenser liners and spill buckets along with monthly visual inspections of the Double Walled Steel AST. The Facilitys CFR, RDRL and Proof of Financial Responsibility were provided and found to be correct. Monthly visual inspections were presented and had been performed monthly and within the 35 day requirement. Records of Monthly Liquid status results were also provided and reviewed. Tapes appeared in order and all sensors alarms were corrected and explained. During this inspection a Liquid Status and alarm History report were run; all sensors were in a status of normal and The Alarm History Report displayed no unusual alarms; however the annual testing of the Electronic Monitoring System (Veeder Root TLS-350 EQ-197) and Line Leak Detectors has not been performed. Have operability tests performed then forward a copy of the test results and a valid Alarm History Report to this office. STCM information does not reflect current contact ifnormation; complete the enclosed Tank Registration Form and return to this office. During the Physical Inspection the dispenser liner and STP sump containments were dry and found to be in good condition. Dispenser Shear Valve anchor was present and properly anchored. Double wall piping integrity appeared sufficient; piping test boots were loose and interstices were open to allow any release of product to be contained and detected. Spill buckets were in good condition, clean, dry and properly color coded. The Lube Oil AST was in good condition, interstice was dry. Cover letter as mailed to facility attached.
03/14/2007 Violation Closed Dery, Wayne C.
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1001
Rule: 62-761.400(1)(a), 62-761.400(1)(b)
Comments: Does STCM accurately reflect the tanks at the facility? This question concerns the registration process and payment of fees only - it is not about accurate registration. Check the number of tanks listed on the registration placard. Can the facility owner/operator produce a registration form to document submittal to DEP? At the time of tank closure, a registration form should be submitted showing the change in tank codes.
Comments:
Comment Date: 09/27/2007 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: Storage Tank Facility Annual Site Inspection Performed on 9/25/2007. Facilitys Primary Release Detection Method is Monthly Visual Inspection of all regulated aboveground storage tank system components including the tank, piping and containment. The facilities Tank Registration Placard, CFR, RDRL, Proof of Financial Responsibility and Monthly visual inspections were available, reviewed and found to be correct. Monthly visual inspections had been performed monthly, within the required 35 day time frame and accurately reflected site conditions. The facility has (1) 1000 gallon single wall steel tank equipped with a Krueger Pop-up Gauge in a concrete block secondary containment. The tank feeds a generator for an irrigation pump the piping exits the top of the tank and drop to the generator. The containment is equipped with a drain valve which was closed at the time of this inspection. Piping is single wall above ground synthetic material. Piping was in adequate condition and isolation and anti siphon valves were in place. The tank was in good condition and was properly painted for corrosion protection. The containment was clean, dry and properly sealed. Cover Letter as Mailed to Facility Attached.
03/14/2007 Violation Closed Dery, Wayne C.
Significance: SNC-B Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1004
Rule: 62-761.400(3)(a)1.
Comments: There are various financial responsibility mechanisms available: Risk Retention Group (RRG) Endorsements Certificate of Insurance Guarantee Letter of Credit Fully Funded Trust Fund Self-Insurance with letter from CFO Stand-by Trust Fund Bond Rating Test (Local Governments) Local Government Financial Test Local Government Guarantee Local Government Fund For detailed information, refer to the DEP's Financial Responsibility Handbook pages 2-1, 2-2. Verify which mechanism(s) are used by the facility. State and federal facilities are exempt from financial responsibility, being considered a type of self insurance. They are always in compliance for this category. Document state or federal as appropriate. Financial responsibility must be maintained on out-of-service tanks. Note: Mark the absence of/or the lack of complete info in the certification of financial responsibility under Rule 62-761.710(2).
Comments:
Comment Date: 09/27/2007 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: Facility Annual Compliance Site Inspection performed on 9/27/2007. Facilitys Primary method of Release Detection is Monthly Monitoring of double wall tank interstice in conjunction with monthly visual inspections of all aboveground storage tank system components including the tank, piping, spill bucket and dispensing equipment. The facility consists of (1) 12,000 gallon double walled steel vehicular diesel tank. The tank is equipped with a Krueger pop up gauge for interstitial monitoring; the gauge showed the interstice as empty at the time of inspection. The facility Tank Registration Placard, CFR, Proof of Financial responsibility, RDRL and Monthly Visual Inspections were available, reviewed and found to be correct. Monthly Visual inspections had been performed monthly, within the required 35 day time frame and appeared to accurately reflect site conditions. During the physical inspection the Tank and above ground piping were found to be in good condition, required valves were in place. The spill bucket was clean dry and painted for corrosion protection. The dispenser was in good condition and the liner was clean with an inconsequential amount of storm water well below all piping, entry points and equipment. Cover letter mailed to facility as attached.
03/14/2007 Violation Closed Dery, Wayne C.
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Criteria ID: 1002
Rule: 62-761.400(2)(a)
Comments: Does STCM accurately reflect the tanks at the facility? This question concerns the registration process and payment of fees only - it is not about accurate registration. Check the number of tanks listed on the registration placard. Can the facility owner/operator produce a registration form to document submittal to DEP? Does STCM show that all DEP fees are paid? At the time of tank closure, a registration form should be submitted showing the change in tank codes.
Comments:
Comment Date: 09/27/2007 User: DERY_WC_1
Description: Installation Site Visit Performed 9/17/2007. Inspector Jay Dery onsite for the installation of 2 DW fibergalss clad Steel tanks. (1) 10,000 gallon single compartment tank and (1) 10,000 gallon dual compartment (6/4 split) tank. Dane Terrel with Advantage Environmental was the foreman on site. 6 deadmen were set (2 on east side of excavtion, 2 on the west side and 2 on center). The tanks were set between deadman and then strapped down with fiberglass straps. Upon Arrival the vacume gauges were placed on the tank- readings were 21" for each tank. The tanks were manufacured by newberry tanks according to ACT100 standards and bore the UL numbers C840017) single comparment and C840019 (dual compartment)- (EQ-339)
02/09/2007 Emergency Preparedness Information Activity Cassels, Carol R.
Activity Result: Satisfied Activity Status: Closed
Activity Closed Date: 02/09/2007
Comments:
Comment Date: 10/26/2007 User: CASSELS_CR_1
Description: Release Detection is Monthly Visual Inspections of AST #1, including the secondary containment, and all aboveground piping. Records Reviewed: Registration Placard was not current, cited above. Financial Responsibility demonstrated, Commerce & Industry, 1/31/07-1/31/08, all tank info correct. Certification of Financial Responsibility form current, with records. Release Detection Response Level statement accurate, with records. Monthly Visual Inspections reviewed from 1/2006 to 10/2007, all inspection dates within 35-day timeframe, conditions noted, minor repairs noted; two years records available. Facility records in very good order. Inspection: 1000 gallon Generator/Pump Diesel, SW steel tank, painted, in good condition, no leaks or staining, no corrosion; tank supports are on wood blocks to prevent corrosion. A concrete block Secondary Containment of adequate size in good condition, sealant in good condition, containment dry and clean, no staining or spills in or around containment, no cracks, roofed, no drain valve; fill port is directly on top of tank and is vented, no level gauge. Piping: All aboveground, small diameter 3/8 inch, synthetic tubing, suction supply and return lines exit top of tank and secondary containment and lead overhead through open-ended pvc pipe to the pump engine immediately adjacent; in good condition. Isolation and solenoid anti-siphon valves installed on the supply line at the point of exit from tank in the correct positions. Minor wetting at connection fittings but no active leaking. Facility is very clean. Non-Compliance Cover Letter as mailed to facility attached.
09/19/2006 Emergency Preparedness Information Activity Crowell, Margaret P.
Activity Result: Satisfied Activity Status: Closed
Activity Closed Date: 09/26/2006
Comments:
Comment Date: 06/08/2007 User: WINN_JP_1
Description: Performed routine annual compliance inspection on 05/25/2007. Method of release detection is monthly visual inspection of ASTs, their secondary containment and all accessible components. Tanks appeared in good condition, with no cracks and no apparent corrosion. Fill ports on top of tanks looked clean and in good condition. Overfill protection provided by manually sticking tanks. Dispensers located within the same containment as tanks and appeared in good condition. Secondary containment drains to an oil/water separator and valve checked shut. Some parts of sealant on secondary containment appear to be beginning to separate from containment wall. Maintenance manager is apparently aware of and is keeping up with sealant maintenance. Placard is current and posted.
12/02/2005 Legacy Activity Paoli, Danielle L.
Activity Name: RESPONSE RECEIVED BY DEPARTMENT Activity Status: Closed
Completion Notes: TANK TIGHTNESS TEST RESULTS.
11/22/2005 Legacy Activity Paoli, Danielle L.
Activity Name: NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER ISSUED Activity Status: Closed
11/10/2005 Violation Closed Paoli, Danielle L.
Significance: SNC-B Status: Closed
Rule: 761.610(1)(a)
11/10/2005 Legacy Activity Paoli, Danielle L.
Activity Name: TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION Activity Status: Closed
Completion Notes: ONE PHOTO TAKEN. PIPING: DOUBLE-WALLED RIGID FIBERGLASS PIPES, PISCES BY OPW.
11/04/2004 Legacy Activity Conover, Marty
Activity Name: NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER ISSUED Activity Status: Closed
10/22/2004 Legacy Activity Conover, Marty
Activity Name: RESPONSE RECEIVED BY DEPARTMENT Activity Status: Closed
Completion Notes: RECEIVED TEST RESULTS. RESOLVED VIOLATION #1103 & 1117 & 157.
10/12/2004 Violation Closed Conover, Marty
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Rule: 761.640(4)(a)
Comments:
Comment Date: 02/07/2020 User: RAMSEY_TH_1
Description: Routine Compliance Inspection Joe Crawford assisted with the tank inspection 2 Single wall steel tanks (On Road and Off Road Diesel) installed within concrete containment. Fueling Dispensers are located inside containment area. Containment area is clean and maintained - tanks and aboveground piping are in good condition Tanks have remote fill piping inside containment area. Containment area has no drains and is dry with a roof overhead. No discharges were observed Reviewed records - Monthly visual inspections, Registration Placard, and Financial Responsibility. A copy of the Inspection Report and In Compliance Letter were emailed to Joe Crawford (vewplant@vewhitehurst.com)
10/12/2004 Legacy Activity Conover, Marty
Activity Name: TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION Activity Status: Closed
Completion Notes: NO PHOTOS TAKEN. PIPING-UNDERGROUND OPW PISCES EQ-285 DOUBLE-WALLED LINES.
10/12/2004 Violation Closed Conover, Marty
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Rule: 761.700(1)(c)3
Comments:
Comment Date: 02/07/2020 User: COLSON_NJ_1
Description: The UST systems were removed from site. Submit the full Closure Assessment Report as a method of incident investigation.
06/16/2003 Legacy Activity Conover, Marty
Activity Name: RESPONSE RECEIVED BY DEPARTMENT Activity Status: Closed
06/04/2003 Comment MIGRATION
Description: GENERAL: Piping-underground OPW Pisces EQ-285 double-walled lines.
06/02/2003 Legacy Activity Conover, Marty
Activity Name: NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER ISSUED Activity Status: Closed
05/13/2003 Violation Closed Conover, Marty
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Rule: 640(3)(d)
Comments:
Comment Date: 07/06/2017 User: ULRICH_CA_1
Description: Crompco was on site 6/27/17 to perform containment testing and the Regular Spill bucket closest to the STP failed a vacuum test, but the primary bucket passed the hydro test. Sunoco Maintenance has issued a work order to Decon to check out the buckets and make necessary repairs or replacements and will retest.
05/13/2003 Legacy Activity Conover, Marty
Activity Name: TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION Activity Status: Closed
Completion Notes: NO PHOTOS TAKEN. RESOLVES VIOLATION #144.
05/13/2003 Violation Closed Conover, Marty
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Rule: 700(1)(c)3
Comments:
Comment Date: 07/06/2017 User: NATALINE_GE_1
Description: Annual Operability Test of Tank # 1 Krueger interstitial leak gauge was performed by Guardian on 12/16/2016 with passing results.
04/30/2002 Legacy Activity Conover, Marty
Activity Name: RESPONSE RECEIVED BY DEPARTMENT Activity Status: Closed
Completion Notes: RECEIVED TANK TIGHTNESS TEST
03/28/2002 Legacy Activity Dimas-Brooks, Melody
Activity Name: NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER ISSUED Activity Status: Closed
03/25/2002 Violation Closed Conover, Marty
Significance: SNC-B Status: Closed
Rule: 610(1)(a)
Comments:
Comment Date: 02/05/2015 User: MERRITT_S
Description: 1/28/2015 Conducted a site visit on this date. Facility is open for business but is not selling gas. All Dispensers are flagged off at this time. On 1/27/15 Rip Wright stated that if this situation is not resolved by March 1, 2015 he is going to dig up the tanks so he wont have the responsibility that goes along with his current ownership .
03/25/2002 Legacy Activity Dimas-Brooks, Melody
Activity Name: TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION Activity Status: Closed
03/25/2002 Violation Closed Conover, Marty
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Rule: 700(1)(a)1
Comments:
Comment Date: 02/05/2015 User: PAYNE_CL_1
Description: Annual Tank Compliance Inspection conducted by Charles Payne on 1/22/2015. Meet onsite with Mike Kempton with Integrated Science Solutions Inc. (ISSI) for this inspection. ISSI conducts the monthly inspections of all NAS fuel tanks. For this inspection the (3) 10K ASTs appeared to be in good condition. Containment appears to be in good condition and all cracks have been repaired and recoated. Dispenser sumps are mostly clean and dry. All shear valves are tight. Release detection by monthly visual inspections of tanks and containment area. All records are kept in the Environmental Division office Pensacola NAS. Photos not allowed due to security. Unable to finish inspection and obtain signature due to FIRST/toughpad issues. Copy of inspection emailed to Dean Spencer.
01/23/2001 Legacy Activity Dimas-Brooks, Melody
Activity Name: TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION Activity Status: Closed
05/17/2000 Legacy Activity Conover, Marty
Activity Name: RESPONSE RECEIVED BY DEPARTMENT Activity Status: Closed
05/17/2000 Legacy Activity Conover, Marty
Activity Name: COMPLIANCE W/O FORMAL ENFORCEMENT ACTION Activity Status: Closed
04/25/2000 Violation Closed Dimas-Brooks, Melody
Significance: Minor Status: Closed
Rule: 640(3)(d)
Comments:
Comment Date: 06/01/2011 User: MURLEY_A_1
Description: 06/01/2011 - AM - Met on site with Stephen Phillips for annual compliance inspection. (2) 12,000 gallon double walled Modern Welding fiberglass clad steel U S Ts and double walled fiberglass piping. Release Detection: (2) Tank interstitial sensors and (2) STP sump sensors EQ-614 are monitored by Veeder Root 300J. Spill containment buckets and dispensers/liners are visually inspected monthly. Veeder Root 300J panel shows D1: Autodial Failure and T1: Delivery Needed. According to Danny Phillips, Autodial feature is for inventory only. No tank interstitial or STP sump alarms noted. Audible/visual alarm checked, appears functional. Alarm history report on file. Tanks: (2) Vents. (2) Spill containment buckets checked, appear intact. Fills marked. Dual point vapor recovery present. Ball floats as overfill protection according to plans. (2) STP sumps were not checked today (due to weight of manway covers). Inspection of sumps performed by EPC during site visit on 01/27/11, when the annual in line leak detector tests and operability test of sensors were performed by Discovery Tank Testing. No leakage noted at that time. Dispensers: (5) Dispensers inspected, liners dry. Shear valves have anchors. Secondary test boots appear closed. No leakage noted. Few hoses slightly cracked, must monitor closely during monthly inspections. Records: -Current registration placard posted - 2 tanks. -Financial Responsibility: Commerce and Industry Insurance 03/03/11 to 03/03/12. -Current Certification of Financial Responsibility form on file. -Release Detection Response Level statement on file, complete and accurate. -Monthly monitoring records reviewed 03/04/10 to 05/02/11. Records include: Dispenser/liner inspections Spill containment bucket inspections Tank interstitial and STP sump sensor status printouts Log form indicates Alarm Status Normal means no STP sump or tank interstitial alarms noted and audible/visual alarm checked, functioning. Inspections performed within 35 days, no problems noted. -Annual in line leak detector tests performed by Discovery Tank Testing on 01/27/11, next test due 01/27/12. -Annual operability test of (2) tank interstitial sensors and (2) STP sump sensors performed by Discovery Tank Testing on 01/27/11, next test due 01/27/12. -Alarm history indicates operability test of sensors.
04/25/2000 Legacy Activity Dimas-Brooks, Melody
Activity Name: NON-COMPLIANCE LETTER ISSUED Activity Status: Closed
04/25/2000 Legacy Activity Dimas-Brooks, Melody
Activity Name: TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION Activity Status: Closed
06/25/1999 Legacy Activity Conover, Marty
Activity Name: TANK ANNUAL COMPLIANCE INSPECTION Activity Status: Closed
09/24/1998 Legacy Activity Conover, Marty
Activity Name: TANK INSTALLATION - FINAL INSPECTION Activity Status: Closed